On the Nature of Ingenuousness

by Juleon Schins

Ingenuousness has a positive connotation: that of candidness, especially when applied to children. This essay is written for adults. In them, ingenuousness has a negative connotation, too: that of poorly grasping political or societal mechanisms. In this essay, I shall take ingenuousness in the latter reception.

Curiously, those who see themselves as liberated from Christian prejudice, seem to suffer most of this ingenuousness: the staunch ideologues populating the CGC Church, where CGC stands for climate, gender, and corona. For the most religious ideologues, these issues are not debatable: they form a kind of constitution. Whoever does not abide by it, transgresses the elementary laws of civil behavior. This results in the following set of fatwa’s.

(i) Who believes that humanity is not responsible for climate change: anathema sit. One should rather believe that “green energy” is less polluting than nuclear energy. (ii) Who believes that homosexuality is a sexual vice, which deprives from happiness: anathema sit. One should rather believe that the happiness of children requires them to explore all gender selves (there is a complete alphabet of such options), independently of biological programming. Thirty years ago, I learned about X and Y chromosomes in biology, but that might be old-fashioned. (iii) Who believes that corona measures are idiotic: anathema sit. One should rather believe that the virus emerged naturally from contact between humans and bats; that face diapers reduce the risk of contamination (except when one is involved in BLM manifestations); and that the big money paid for so-called vaccines was not invested in the design of corona 2.0 (soon to be released).

Strangely enough, more than half of my (ex-)friends are adepts of the CGC Church. When we were young, they liked it so much to speak with me about my religious convictions. These convictions were so funny, so original, but so vexingly consistent. Years have passed, and now they find themselves utterly unable to discuss, in the same candid way, their own religious convictions with me, a notorious unbeliever. I know my friends well enough, to sense (even when talking over the telephone), how deeply hurt they feel when I do not agree with their dogmas. My disapproval is like a slap in their face. In the worst of cases, it has become an obstacle to friendship. Whenever two friends depart, two friends bleed. I can only hope their CGC-god is well atoned with their emotional sacrifice.

My God requires rational sacrifice, though. Not an emotional one.

One would therefore expect Christians to be substantially better equipped to refute the dogmas of modernity. It is only too bad that the Pontifex Maximus of Christianity, Pope Francis, is as misguided as every other heathen concerning matters CGC. In the very worst scenario, he actually knows what he is doing. I pray to my God, daily, on my knees, that he knows not what he is doing: for my God commands me to pray for the eternal salvation of my sweet Christ on earth.

What am I referring to? (i) With regard to gender, I refer to the Dubia, and to the not very Christian way in which Pope Francis responded to them. (ii) With regard to climate and population, I refer to Francis’ full agenda overlap with George Soros, who just so happens to be the principal funding agent of the Sankt-Gallen mafia. Without ever mentioning the name of Trump (how exquisitely Jesuitic), Francis severely criticized, during Trump’s election campaign, those who build walls instead of bridges. What a pity Francis never mentioned Israeli expansionism, in one of his many talks he had with Bibi Netanyahu in the Holy Land. Finally, (iii) with regard to corona, suffice it to mention that Pope Francis had the St. Peter formally ‘decontaminated’, whatever that might mean.

If the master of the house is a Beelzebul, how much worse the rest of his household…

Here we have come at the heart of this essay: even though one would expect Christians to be better equipped against the trendy lies of this world, in practice this hardly seems to be the case. For this reason, I will summarize the main events of global historical interest, and based on them, assess the present-day political state of our planet.

The first historical event of interest occurs among the Italian city states of the renaissance, with that great invention of capitalism. No sooner was it invented, and some managed to make a living off a highly immoral abuse of it: the provocation of wars with the goal of increasing one’s capital, duly invested with an eye on foreseeable damage. After two centuries of wars between the involved mafia’s, a prominent champion emerged in the 18th century: Mayer Amschel Bauer. He chose the name (von) Rothschild. His toxic business spread all over Europe, and would soon cross the Atlantic. On this side, the French revolution and Napoleon’s adventures were nothing more than direct consequences of Rothschild politics. It filled their pockets in a hitherto unknown fashion. Overseas, the Rothschild dynasty did likewise, abusing of the American Civil War. Once the British were milked, the ordinary source of income shifted to the suspiciously recurrent American depressions. These were all to easy to provoke, and allowed the Rothschilds to gradually take over the complete American banking competition. In 1913, Rothschild’s triumph was complete, and the American people was so desperate that it acceded to installing the Federal Reserve System.

The American profits were huge, but not yet comparable to the European ones. In the 19th century, the Rothschilds managed to provoke the Franco-German wars, and in the 20th, the two World Wars. These wars allowed the Rothschilds to take over all important banking competition. The clue to their enduring success was their impressive ability to refrain from showing off their wealth. This policy was wisely summarized in Mossad’s old motto, freely translated from Proverbs: by way of deception thou shalt wage war. A structural expose of the Rothschild policy is condensed under the name of the Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion, obviously claimed to be a forgery.

With the occasion of the Israeli-Egyptian war, an American Navy Vessel, baptized ‘USS Liberty’, headed for the Mediterranean war zone in 1967. On June 8, Israeli air force initiated nine hours of warning dives. Finally, they attacked the vessel, leading to 34 dead and 171 injured among the American crew. Both the US Marine and US Congress decided that the incident should have no further political consequences. Whistle blower Lieutenant James Ennes did not understand the ‘media blackout’.

Just like the French have a hard time admitting that the French revolution was provoked by external, malign, obscure forces rather than inspired idealistically, Americans resist the only possible rational conclusion from the USS Liberty episode: by 1967, the Rothschild Empire had both the USA and Israel in its pocket. All mainstream media printed candidly that the incident amounted to little more than ‘a few rounds of misdirected fire’.

A few years earlier, Jack Kennedy had been shot in Memphis. The crucial images, showing the explosion of Kennedy’s head upon impact from the front side (Grassy Knoll), had been carefully deleted from the Zapruder record. In due course, all witnesses testifying pro-conspiracy gradually disappeared. Few Christians realize that Kennedy’s assassination was due to his Executive Order 11,110. Its lawful execution would have ended FED’s headlock on America’s economy.

While Christians continue their innocent sleep, the Rothschilds continue their war against mankind. In 2001, New York’s Twin Towers suddenly crumble. Only mental retards believe the official report of the 9/11 commission, which proposes a conspiracy by a bunch of frustrated Afghan shepherds. Finally, in 2020, the first worldwide virus pandemic occurs. The microbiological evidence in favor of laboratory-produced HIV-inserts is undeniable. The connection with the Rothschild mafia does not end here. In one of her Solari reports, Catherine Austin Pitts concludes that Black-Lives-Matter riots selectively wreaked havoc in those suburbs where the FED intends to expand real estate. What better place than these FED subsidiaries, in order to start with large-scale implants of microchips in human cattle?

These would be the most relevant historical data. They bring me to the final question of this essay: how is it possible that, with all this evidence, even Christians fail to see what is going on?

The effect we face here, is a stunning mental paralysis among the majority of Christians. The cause therefore needs to be at least of that same order of universality. I cannot think of anything even remotely appropriate, apart from that age-old Christian dogma of faith — original sin.